On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 07:14:06PM -0400, Michael George wrote: > I'm trying to add an emergency dial to my context. However, when I try to > dial it, I get caught in an endless loop. > > For debugging, I have pared out nearly all the control flow and just have > ChanIsAvail() and Dial() called. Using two different extensions to call teh > same number, I get two different actions by *. > > Here is the vvverbose output: > > -- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/3-1' > -- Executing Dial("Zap/3-1", "Zap/1/5932336||T") in new stack > -- Called 1/5932336 > -- Zap/1-1 answered Zap/3-1 > -- Attempting native bridge of Zap/3-1 and Zap/1-1 > -- Hungup 'Zap/1-1' > == Spawn extension (internal, 95932336, 1) exited non-zero on 'Zap/3-1' > -- Hungup 'Zap/3-1' > -- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/3-1' > -- Executing ChanIsAvail("Zap/3-1", "Zap/1") in new stack > -- Hungup 'Zap/1-1' > -- Executing NoOp("Zap/3-1", "avail: Zap/1-1") in new stack > -- Executing Dial("Zap/3-1", "Zap/1/5932336||T") in new stack > Aug 20 19:09:27 NOTICE[294926]: app_dial.c:714 dial_exec: Unable to create > channel of type 'Zap' > == Everyone is busy/congested at this time > -- Executing NoOp("Zap/3-1", "busy") in new stack > -- Hungup 'Zap/3-1' > > the first way, I'm matching this context: > exten => _9NXXXXXX,1,Dial(${TrunkLocal}/${EXTEN:${TrunkMSD}},,T) > exten => _9NXXXXXX,2,Congestion > exten => _9517XXXXXXX,1,Dial(${TrunkLocal}/${EXTEN},,T}) > exten => _9517XXXXXXX,2,Congestion > > The second way I'm mathing this one: > exten => 911,1,ChanIsAvail(Zap/1) > exten => 911,2,NoOp(avail: ${AVAILCHAN}) > exten => 911,3,Dial(Zap/1/5932336,,T) > exten => 911,102,NoOp(None Avail) > exten => 911,104,NoOp(busy) > > Why does the latter fail at the Dial()?
I am still having a problem with this call flow. I just updated my * source and rebuilt and reinstalled. I want to implement the feature I saw in Tips & Tricks where before calling an emergency number, the outgoing channel(s) are checked for availability so one can be cleared before trying to dial. The example code is this: exten => 911,1,ChanIsAvail(Zap/1) exten => 911,2,Dial(Zap/1/911) exten => 911,3,Hangup() exten => 911,102,SoftHangup(Zap/1-1) exten => 911,103,Wait(1) exten => 911,104,Goto(1) However, every time I try this flow, the Dial() called immediately after the ChanIsAvail() will fail as busy (return to prio+101). I know the channel is available because I see that ChanIsAvail() went to prio+1. Has there been a change in the code that might cause this? Perhaps an issue in the zaptel driver? Thanks! -- -M There are 10 kinds of people in this world: Those who can count in binary and those who cannot. _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users