On Sat, 2004-09-18 at 17:21, Lyle Giese wrote: > Perfectly normal. On analog lines, the caller id is set between the 1st and > 2nd rings. So Asterisk has to wait for the caller id and depending on the > speed of the computer that hosts Asterisk, 13 seconds is exactly right. A > normal ring cycle is 2 secs ring on 4 seconds of silence, so the 2nd ring is > 12 seconds into the call. > > I just put in a nice Asus motherboard with a 500 mhz front side bus, 2.4 gig > AMD processor & 512 meg ram for the pbx here and I get the first ring on the > extensions at the same time as the second ring on the incoming ring. I was > testing and trialing on a celeron 1.4ghz machine with 256 meg ram and the > video borrowed some of the system ram. The analog extensions were not > ringing until the third incoming ring on that slow machine.
System speed has VERY little to do with this. If Asterisk expects to get Caller*ID and the PSTN line does not have Caller*ID service on the line. Asterisk has to wait until the beginning of the second ring before giving up on getting any Caller*ID. If your PSTN line doesn't have Caller*ID service then tell Asterisk not to expect Caller*ID then the delay will be MUCH less. This is covered over and over and over again in the mailing list archives. -- Eric Wieling * BTEL Consulting * 504-899-1387 x2111 "In a related story, the IRS has recently ruled that the cost of Windows upgrades can NOT be deducted as a gambling loss." _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users