In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Peter Svensson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 25 Sep 2004, Steve Underwood wrote: > > But the patches aren't a derived work. That is the value they have here. > > There are an independant adjunct work. > > According to most lawyers a patch _is_ a derived work in nearly all > circumstances. E.g. a novel based on the characters from a novel by > another author is a derived work.
No, a patch *itself* is not a derived work. It is a set of instructions enabling the user of the patch to create a derived work from the original. Cheers Tony -- Tony Mountifield Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.softins.co.uk Play: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://tony.mountifield.org _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users