In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Peter Svensson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Sep 2004, Steve Underwood wrote:
> > But the patches aren't a derived work. That is the value they have here. 
> > There are an independant adjunct work.
> 
> According to most lawyers a patch _is_ a derived work in nearly all 
> circumstances. E.g. a novel based on the characters from a novel by 
> another author is a derived work.

No, a patch *itself* is not a derived work. It is a set of instructions
enabling the user of the patch to create a derived work from the original.

Cheers
Tony
-- 
Tony Mountifield
Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.softins.co.uk
Play: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://tony.mountifield.org
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Reply via email to