Alex Barnes wrote:
Else would VPN's with IPSec or whatever incur less overhead????
IPSec VPNs use UDP and IPSec protocols (you can just think of both as "udp") rather than TCP for transport so I would think they have less "overhead" as you call it. TCP based tunnels (like SSH tunnels) do all sorts of things that will totally screw up latency (congestion control, retransmit lost packets, etc). For most applications this is not an issue. Who cares if there's 2000ms of jitter on an HTTP request?
begin:vcard fn:Eric Wileing n:Wileing;Eric email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] tel;work:504-899-1387 x2120 x-mozilla-html:FALSE version:2.1 end:vcard
_______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
