Brian McSpadden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 17:50:55 -0400, Kanuri, Seshu (Company IT)<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > He's just playing like he doesn't know what we're talking about. He > knows good and well that there's no free open g.729 implementation. It > is open source only in the fact that you can indeed look at the source > code, but it is definitely not free to use, and that's what he means. > That's not what I mean at all. The Intel library would be free to use in any free country (the USA is not a free country), as long as you have an appropriate license from Intel, but that's not the point.
The referenced codec is not open source, as the Intel library is not available in source form. One cannot inspect the G.729 code and make modifications etc. The patch file is the only part that's GPLed. Given that this is the case, I thought that someone else must have released an "open source G.729 codec". -- _/ _/ _/_/_/_/ _/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ _/_/_/ _/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/ _/ K e v i n W a l s h _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] _/ _/ _/_/_/_/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
