On Tue, 2004-10-26 at 16:42 -0400, Chris Stratton wrote: > I have been working with FastAGI. I really like it and the idea. But I > was curious why the decision was made to not follow a standard http > protocol approach? If it had been http, I could then use all the > conventional tools that already exist to maintain state, grab name > value pairs or any number of things.
Probably because the conventional tools for http don't make sense in telephony? I do not see why I would care about sessioning on a phone call. Sessioning is to take care of lack of state, but we have state. BTW, be more patient next time before reposting your message. Not all of the people here who could give you a definitive answer live on their computers. -- Steven Critchfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
