i don't have a specific bug in mind, i was just wondering WHY call progress doesn't work so well -- in particular, on analog lines. ie. is it a hardware or software problem (or both). with more info, i'd like to help to work out the kinks, for myself and everyone. :)
>I have the same problem. >callprogress is very experimental and buggy now. >and i've lost the .call files feature of asterisk. >what do you think about submitting a bug on bugs.digium.com? > not sure what you mean by 'lost the .call files feature', but if you have a specific bug to post, i think it would be great if you posted it. > regards, > shabanip > > > Hello, > > > > I've been experimenting with the call progress analysis features of *, > > with mixed success on Zap as well as IAX channels. I've read all the > > posts about it, including (but not limited to) > > http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+auto-dial+out and the pages it > > references. > > > > My question is, what's the current state -- is there any work in progress > > right now to improve the reliability of * call progress detection? last I > > saw it was still listed as 'experimental'. > > > > What are the "problems" that are preventing a more robust implementation > > of call progress detection? Would this work better with different > > hardware (ie. I've had success in the past using Dialogic telephony > > boards)? Or is this primarily a software issue with *? > > > > Thanks much! > > Regards, > > Steve _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users