Peter Svensson wrote:
On Sun, 28 Nov 2004, Brian West wrote:
I don't agree with this patch yet... It's the distro's fault for doing this
wrong and I don't feel we have to work around it. The few people I talked
to have Symlinks the "build" to /usr/src/linux or the like. Then again I
may be wrong anyone know what is the right(tm) thing to do here is?
Havn't 2.6 adopted the /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build/ convention or
something similar?
Not having any 2.6-based machines online at the moment I can not check.
This is from memory compiling out-of-tree modules a while back.
Peter
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Well - if 2.6.etc did adopt this it isn't reflected in actual make/make
install world - i.e. nothing gets installed in /lib/modules/anywhere...
And this is with kernel source from kernel.org - not a distro-tweaked
source tree
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
