Just adding my 2 cents..
I have used PCI cards before that say PCI 2.2 on them (not specifying whether it is a requirement) on machines that don't support it (old old). The cards functioned perfectly in all cases.
Note: These were not digium cards.
Regards,
Kimble Young
Lee wrote:
The Digium web site says that the card is "PCI 2.2 Compliant," which to me says that the card *supports* that standard, not that PCI 2.2 is *required*.
The data sheet states In "Hardware and Software Requirements": "Available PCI Slot" Now, call me crazy, but that doesn't pretty much means any PCI slot of any kind(!)
I would think if PCI 2.2 is required that such facts would be included in the requirements section of the data sheet. If indeed PCI 2.2 *is* required then Digium should carefully change their pre-sales documentation.
So my question remains: Is PCI 2.2 a requirement to use the TDM400P card? If so, where is this specified? If not, is there a performance difference when using PCI 2.1?
Thanks and regards! _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
_______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
