Hello, Have you analized quality of the calls ? what was quality of 190 call ? :)
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 19:51:28 -0800, Jim Gottlieb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've been testing both T400P and TE405P boards and I'm running into > some kind of hard limit on the number of simultaneous calls. This is > on x86 with 2 Athlon MP 2800+ CPUs running Fedora Core 1. > > Everything is fine up to 190 channels, but the 191st call fails every > time with errors like: > > Dec 14 15:44:00 WARNING[1215]: Unable to start PBX on Zap/201-1 > Dec 14 15:44:00 WARNING[1215]: Failed to create update thread! > Dec 14 15:44:00 WARNING[1215]: Unable to start PBX on channel 0/9, span 9 > Dec 14 15:44:00 WARNING[1215]: Call specified, but not found? > Dec 14 15:44:00 WARNING[1215]: Hangup on bad channel 0/9 on span 9 > > It's not tied to which channel the call comes in on. It's some > resource that's exhausted after 190 calls. A limit on threads? > > I thought it might be per-process file descriptors even though we were > only going up to 529 on that PID and I used 'ulimit -n' to increase it > before starting asterisk, but that didn't make a difference. > > # cat /proc/sys/kernel/threads-max > 14336 > > I would think that's enough, but perhaps the per-process limit is much > lower. > > Any clues? > > Thanks... > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > -- Vitaly Nikolaev _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
