On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 12:16:24PM -0600, James Taylor wrote: > On Sat, 25 Dec 2004 10:43:00 -0500, Dorn Hetzel > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >On Sat, Dec 25, 2004 at 04:27:52PM +0800, Ronald Wiplinger wrote: > >>Greg Hill wrote: > >> > >>I am looking for a small device with four FXO and one WAN connection. > >>Simple, so that the cleaning woman can make a hardware reset if > >>necessary. This device should be connnected to my Asterisk box. The box > >>will be used in areas where DIDs are not available yet, and where you > >>not even can make ads for it ;-( > >>It should be cheap, and it should connect either with SIP or IAX. > >>No FXS is needed !!! > >> > >I'm not sure, but I think your best price/performance solution > >might be a very small linux system (1U or smaller) with one > >Digium TDM400P+4*FXO daughtercards. At least the the size > >point of 4*FXO, this may turn out to be your winner. If it > >boots from flash, your cleaning lady can always apply power > >cycle for anything you can't fix via ssh... > > > >By using this solution, you would also get the ongoing > >bandwidth benefit of being able to trunk all 4 FXO calls > >out in a single IAX frame. This will save you money on > >an on-going basis if your bandwidth costs are significant. > > > >Perhaps Soekris would be a good box for this solution, > >but there may be even smaller devices with the needed > >1*PCI interface, I don't know. > > > >Regards, > > > >-Dorn > > A MAX 4096 will work. And they're cheap. > I'm using the TNT's. > Contact me off list. >
That seems kind of overkill to service 4 pots lines ... -Dorn _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users