[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Paul Fielding wrote: >> Hmmm.... I could certainly see that being the issue. If it is the >> issue, though, then I think it's something that needs to be >> addressed. >> >> In my opinion, Digium needs to address it, as well as the whole >> provisioning via cli thing. I know Asterisk itself is a CLI oriented >> piece of software, but the more one can do do decrease configuration >> timing and issues the better off one is. I think it would be a >> benefit to allow the IAXy to be programmed via web interface. >> >> For that matter, from what I can tell via my own experimentation, it >> appears that you cannot use DNS to define the asterisk server to it. >> This is bad, since it means that if the IP of the asterisk server >> changes, you need to directly reprovision *all* of your IAXy >> devices.... >> >> For a new product, it has potential, hopefully these things will be >> addressed.... > > The IAXy does not have the CPU, RAM, or Flash to be able to add any > significant features. I think it has 4k or RAM and 4k of > Flash.
Well, that certainly limits it's useful future. A neat toy, with limited market potential. I'd certainly like to hear about it's successor, then, because any kind of IAX-based ATA is something that would seem to have a future with Asterisk. -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.296 / Virus Database: 265.6.6 - Release Date: 28/12/2004 _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users