Steve Kann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > chan_oss (if that's what you're using, you don't say)
Damn, forgot to mention that;). > There's probably lots of places where buffering is happening Where else than chan_alsa and chan_oss? > but I'd look into chan_oss and how it uses your soundcard. I've tried both alsa and oss and get about the same result. From the source, chan_alsa.c and chan_oss.c, I see that the buffer is set to 60ms; way lower than what I'm experiencing. I'm really interesting in what other people get when running the echo test. Is this just me or is it a bug?. -- Esben Stien is [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.esben-stien.name irc://irc.esben-stien.name/%23contact [sip|iax]:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
