[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Jim Van Meggelen wrote: > >> So 1.0.x STABLE will become 1.2.0 STABLE, and 1.1.x HEAD will be >> continued as 1.3.0 HEAD >> >> Could be wrong, but it'd make sense. > > It would make sense if we ever did unstable releases from HEAD, but we > don't do that currently :-)
I had always thought that the difference between STABLE and HEAD *was* the stability. Not so much stability in terms of code, but more in terms of features and compatibility. Is that not the same numbering philosophy that applies with Linux? -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.7.2 - Release Date: 21/01/2005 _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
