Adding in experimental patches willy-nilly, especially ones that have
the potential to cause huge problems, confounds attempts to isolate
bugs and test functionality.
Mark does a pretty good job of keeping the HEAD version solid enough
to use in production, as most of us running it on a daily basis can
attest.
What stops you from applying the patches to your own copy, and then
playing with it to your heart's content--like the rest of us? It
would work just like it had really been put into CVS-HEAD.
less testers
less bug reports
for production use is stable version (asterisk doesnt have good
roadmap and versioning :( )
My point exactly
If we're to see this in 1.2, we need it in CVS ASAP
roy
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users