The only "problem" is that it is bandwidth inefficient and may cause a CPU hit on your IAD (since you have effectively doubled the pps for a call).
The packets should be 10ms apart. Perhaps the timestamp is not in ms. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pedro > Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 5:20 PM > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Sipura g729 call quality to PSTN > > > That does not sound right at all. The difference between the two Time= > > values should have been 10 (milliseconds). > > > > Did you reboot the Sipura after making the change? There are some values > > in the Sipura that don't take effect until after the next reboot; I don't > > have a clue whether this happens to be one of them. > > Yes - sipura was rebooted. Actually, the changes did seem to take > affect even before the reboot (verified by call quality improvement > and ethereal traces). > > So in your opinion, instead of 80, it should be a difference of 10? > If so - then you are saying that the timestamp is in miliseconds? > > I am as puzzled as you - really does not seem logical, but call > quality is finally decent and it does not seem to bother asterisk at > all. Do you see any potential problems with this? > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
