Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote: > FYI: FWD shows a different inbound prefix: > > **164 e164.org 8781039311
Yes that works as well, and was issued by another company, the contact > at FWD asked if we could route that to them as well, I prefer the other range because it's shorter and we've always routed it like that so it's easier for me to remember... > Is there enough spare numbering space there for you to assign e164.org > dialable numbers to people in the asterisk community too? Technically no, but we do it anyways despite how much the ITU loves us for doing it :) In the telephone world there is no equivalent to private LAN IP ranges, we're hoping if we get enough support for what we're doing to be allocated the +88299 range, (highly unlikely to funnier things have been known to happen) > While it might be nice for asterisk home users to have their single > DID listed, it strikes me that the real utility would be to have a > blocks of 100 or 1000 numbers assigned to folks, so they could have > each of their voip phones directly dialable from anyone that queries > your db. We have always offered blocks of 100 numbers in the +88299 range for anyone that wants them, catch being that they're not really allocated by anyone/body except our DNS zone... Any number ranges in our zone are also accessible from FWD etc etc etc... -- Best regards, Duane http://www.cacert.org - Free Security Certificates http://www.nodedb.com - Think globally, network locally http://www.sydneywireless.com - Telecommunications Freedom http://happysnapper.com.au - Sell your photos over the net! http://e164.org - Using Enum.164 to interconnect asterisk servers "In the long run the pessimist may be proved right, but the optimist has a better time on the trip." _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users