On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 04:14:54 +0200, Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 04:37:02PM -0500, Dana Olson wrote: > > > My company has thousands of entries in the DHCP server, and it would > > take forever to go through each and every one of them. Not to mention > > that I, being in the telecom division, do not have access to the DHCP > > servers. > > scan for a MAC address? > > ping all the addresses in the range and then > > /usr/sbin/arp -n |grep -i that_mac_addr > > The scanning part could be done using something like: > > nmap -sP 192.168.1-5.* > > Another simple trick (assuming a mostly windows network) is to simply > ping to the broadcast address. Linux-es and macs tend to respond to > those pings and so are most devices. Windows tend to ignore those pings. > > -- > Tzafrir Cohen | New signature for new address and | VIM is > http://tzafrir.org.il | new homepage | a Mutt's > [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | best > ICQ# 16849755 | Space reserved for other protocols | friend
The MAC addresses are not labeled on the units. I swear I said that already. _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users