On Apr 8, 2005 4:08 PM, John Novack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bruno Hertz wrote: > > <>Jean-Michel Hiver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Jean-Michel Hiver wrote: > Oops, sorry for the list reply :/ > > > <>Actually, why does the Reply-To point to the Asterisk Users mailing > list? This breaks the reply to sender only / reply to all / list reply > functionality of my mailer. It's really broken :( > Some would say your mail client is broken. What you're complaining about is > generally called 'reply-to munging', and there's been a long discussion > about this. Google reveals more, like these two oppositional opinions > > http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html > http://www.metasystema.net/essays/reply-to.mhtml > > Regards, Bruno. > And there probably will NEVER ba an agreement on this subject. > Another list I am on even went so far as to take a poll, and it was split > right down the middle, half taking the correct position outlined in the > first article, and half the second, much less flexible, position.. > > The really curious thing on this list is every so often, if I choose to > reply, the poster AND the list appear, but mostly just the list, as if the > poster had some control as well. > > John Novack >
I generally find there are 2 types of mailing list. Announcements and Discussions. In an announcement list you want replies to go to the announcer direct. On a discussion list you generally want to reply to the list taking part in the discussion. It all depends on so many things. My 2c _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
