Look at the "ms =" statements in the code. I'm trying to rewrite the code right now to provide something more useful.
------------------------ > Im using RH9 and celerom 1.7 with 256 Mb RAM > > Can you give me the detailed math on your calculations? > > |-----Original Message----- > |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > |Rich Adamson > |Sent: Sábado, 30 de Abril de 2005 11:07 a.m. > |To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > |Subject: RE: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Problems with TDM400P card > | > |The way that zttest is written makes it a little difficult to > |interpret, but it essentially means that zttest tried to read > |8192 bytes from the TDM card, and it took more then 1 second > |to do it (the objective is exactly 1.00000 seconds, or 100%). > |The 99.987 numbers says it took something like 1.021111 > |seconds to read the 8192 bytes instead. Because it took about > |21,0000 microseconds too long, frame slips are going to be > |happening approximately every 10 seconds. (That's why spandsp > |doesn't work > |right.) > |I'm not sure (as yet) what the source of the delays are, but > |that's what some of us are trying to figure out. > | > |What OS distro are you using? > | > |------------------------ > |> Hows does this look? > |> > |> Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy... > |> > |> 8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.000000% > |> 8192 samples in 8193 sample intervals 99.987793% > |> 8192 samples in 8193 sample intervals 99.987793% > |> 8192 samples in 8193 sample intervals 99.987793% > |> 8192 samples in 8193 sample intervals 99.987793% > |> 8192 samples in 8193 sample intervals 99.987793% > |> 8192 samples in 8193 sample intervals 99.987793% > |> 8192 samples in 8193 sample intervals 99.987793% > |> 8192 samples in 8193 sample intervals 99.987793% > |> 8192 samples in 8194 sample intervals 99.975586% > |> 8192 samples in 8193 sample intervals 99.987793% > |> 8192 samples in 8193 sample intervals 99.987793% > |> 8192 samples in 8193 sample intervals 99.987793% > |> --- Results after 13 passes --- > |> Best: 100.000000 -- Worst: 99.975586 -- Average: 99.987793 > |> > |> Good enough and what do I need to check in order to make 100%? What > |> does the test actually measure? > |> > |> > |> > |> |-----Original Message----- > |> |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > |> |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kim > |> |Culhan > |> |Sent: Sábado, 30 de Abril de 2005 08:45 a.m. > |> |To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > |> |Subject: Re: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Problems with TDM400P card > |> | > |> |On Fri, April 29, 2005 4:58 pm, GEOFFREY SACHS said: > |> |> I would also be interested in alternatives to the Tdm400p. I > |> |have had > |> |> endless problems with a tdm400p card not being able to get > |> |the zttest > |> |> numbers above > |> |> 99.975 and as a result not being able eliminate an > |> |intermitent but consistent echo. > |> |> I have tried to date 4 different motherboard and hardware > |> |combinations > |> |> as well as different linux versions to no avial.I would > |> |welcome some feedback on this. > |> | > |> |Since there appear to be several combinations of hardware and > |> |operating system which don't work well, here is a combination which > |> |appears to work fairly well: > |> | > |> |Intel 925XCV mb > |> | > |> |P-4 560 (3.6 gHz) > |> | > |> |wcfxs0: <Wildcard TDM400P REV E/F> > |> | > |> |FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE > |> | > |> |zttest -v > |> |Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy... > |> | > |> |8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.000000% > |> |8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.000000% > |> |8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.000000% > |> |8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.000000% > |> |8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.000000% > |> |8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.000000% > |> |8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.000000% > |> |8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.000000% > |> |8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.000000% > |> |8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.000000% ^C > |> |--- Results after 10 passes --- > |> |Best: 100.000000 -- Worst: 100.000000 -- Average: 100.000000 > |> | > |> |hope this helps > |> | > |> |-kim > |> | > |> |-- > |> |[EMAIL PROTECTED] > |> |_______________________________________________ > |> |Asterisk-Users mailing list > |> |Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com > |> |http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > |> |To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > |> | http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > |> | > |> | > |> > |> _______________________________________________ > |> Asterisk-Users mailing list > |> Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com > |> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > |> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > |> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > |> > | > |---------------End of Original Message----------------- > | > | > |_______________________________________________ > |Asterisk-Users mailing list > |Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com > |http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > |To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > | http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > | > | > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > ---------------End of Original Message----------------- _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users