Rich Adamson wrote:
Steve, what would help a bunch of people trying to implement your
spandsp is some kind of help document that at least attempts to
describe some of the debug statements shown below. When the average
person reads "hdlc underflow" or "T4 timeout in state 9", we don't
have a clue what those statements really mean or even if they need
to be addressed. I've probably spent at least 60 hours doing the
same thing and finally gave up.
If you really want to reduce your support overhead for spandsp, put
something together that gives the implementor at least some clues
how to read that stuff, and maybe even a clue how to resolve some
of the more common issues. The foip.html appears to be a reasonable
'background', but certainly not anything reaonable to resolve the
OP debug output below.
Actually, that page explains why he is wasting his time. It wasn't
intended as background material. It was intended as the minimum needed
to get people off my back when they insist that if they use ulaw or alaw
FAXing over a VoIP channel must be OK. Its the only support for this
kind of issue they will get from me.
Wow, I didn't get it and I'd bet the OP didn't either.
So let me get his clear. If I don't document things I am in the wrong,
whereas if I do document them I am in the wrong. Is that it?
What is the page supposed to say? Something like:
IF YOU TRY TO FAX OVER A VOIP CHANNEL YOU ARE WASTING YOUR TIME. DON'T
WASTE MINE.
maybe? Would that win your seal of approval? -)
Regards,
Steve
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
