He is right Karl. Without the ship-to being on file with the bank.. the company can be held responsible for fraudulant purchases.
On 5/31/05, Karl J. Vesterling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm amazed that this thread keeps going... > > About the claim of Ship-To being on file with bank... > > CDW doesn't have a problem with it... Ingram Micro doesn't have a problem > with it. Merisel doesn't have a problem with it. Digi-Key doesn't have a > problem with it... Why would Voip-Supply??? > > We accept packages every day with the same Ship-To address specified to > Voip-Supply... > > Additional comments dispursed throughout.... > > At 02:32 PM 5/27/2005, you wrote: > > On 5/27/05, Karl J. Vesterling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > At 08:59 AM 5/27/2005, you wrote: > > > > [ snip for brevity ] > > I just wanted to clarify ... this isn't a voipsupply.com problem at all, > > but > > rather a courier screwup... which happens anywhere and at anytime... > right? > > > > TWO screw ups in the shipment. > > 1.) It was shipped to the Bill-To address. Since there is no one there > > during the day I had to sit and wait for it lest it not be delivered. > > This screw up has to do with the person that ordered it, because they > didn't have the ship to address on file with their bank. > This was not a paypal transaction. > The PO had BIG BOLD LETTERS - "Ship To:" > > I'm unaware of any practices with the bank that requiring Ship-To addresses > to be on file with them. > Perhaps your financial institution is a bit different? > > > > > 2.) when an order is placed on a Tuesday AM (or) Monday PM, and it's > > priority overnight, and it's across town, and the tracking number was > > supplied on Wednesday one would expect that it would show up Thursday, > not > > Friday. > > See above, again this is a screw up that happened because of the one > that ordered it, by NOT having the ship to address on file with their > bank. > Where do you get this Ship-To on file w/ Bank idea? > > > > Anyhow, you were already answered before that it had to do because YOU > didn't have the address on file with your bank. Why are you repeating > this lie that it is voipsupply.coms fault? > Be repeating it you make yourself look more like a politician or media > person, but certainly not someone that is in the electronic > engineering business. No I will not believe it because I read it > twice, so stop it. > No lie... Fact. There is a difference... > > > > > > So, what we have here is one problem compounded by another, none on > behalf > > of the courier. > > Exactly, but on behalf of the ordered. > > If you give a Ship-To address that is NOT on file with your bank, you > will NOT get it to that address, and it WILL delay shipping. > Gosh dang spin doctors... > Where does it state this??? > Prove it. > > > > > > Best Regards, > Karl J. Vesterling > E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ________________________________ > Telephone: > Washington DC: (202) 448-3009 Extension 0 > Annapolis MD: (240) 524-6706 Extension 0 > Bethesda MD: (301) 576-3014 Extension 0 > Niagara Falls NY: (716) 286-9175 Extension 0 > Buffalo NY: (716) 608-1121 Extension 0 > ________________________________ > Yahoo Messenger: karl_vesterling > ICQ: 1548052 > AOL Instant Messenger: n2vqm > ________________________________ > > > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users