We use batch sphinx to analyze recordings at night. We attempted real-time sphinx, but it is way too slow and resource-intensive to use for realtime on Asterisk with more than a couple lines at once(and that's at the poor quality settings). We have not tried sphinx4, but I wouldn't imagine that it would be that much improved in speed over version 3.
MATT--- -----Original Message----- From: Brian Roy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2005 6:56 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Opinions of Sphinx? On 5/31/05, Alistair Cunningham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Has anyone tried Asterisk and Sphinx (bonus points if in a production > environment)? If so, what's your opinion on quality of recognition, > stability, resource usage, etc? Alistair, Well, it's been a couple weeks and no answers on the list. That isn't encouraging, but I'm hoping to accomplish some of the same thing. Have you made any progress on your own with this? Let me(us) know... Thanks, -Brian _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
