Peter,
System clocks are always pretty flakey. On all my machines I set up
ntpdate to run every 6 hours. Even on my best machine it will adjust the
clock usually .7-1.1 seconds every time it synchs and the bad systems
5-12 seconds. My main ntpd server I synch every hour from one of the u
of t ntp servers which are Stratum2 time servers.
Mike
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, dude. Excellent information on this list, as per usual. Now if I could
just get the clock on the motherboard fixed. Seems like its losing its settings
a lot but the battery looks OK. I think I have ntpd working OK in its place.
Peter M.
There are definite benefits to a dual/multi CPU machine. The actual asterisk program isn't multi
threaded so it won't utilize more then one but, when other processes kick off like transcoding,
festival, comedian the OS will utilize the other CPU(s) to distribute the load. SO there is a definite
benefit just not as much as one would totally want.
The only time there is no benefit is when you have no transcoding and only the core asterisk
process running. But this is highly unusual.
Mike
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro*
So running [EMAIL PROTECTED] on a dual processor P2 333 system is still a waste of
processing power? CentOS does recognize both processors and loads the
SMP kernel. Is there any benefit at all?
Peter M.
Maybe crazy enough that it will actually work. It amazes me sometimes
what ideas u come up with!! Some related news:
1) IAX is multithreaded in head now, so should work better on dual
processors than SIP, unless you're using the "other" asterisk sip
stack. Also, a side benefit, silence suppression on IAX will probably
come soon.
On 3/2/06, Jim Van Meggelen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Let me run something that's been floating about in my noggin by everyone:
Given that Asterisk does not make use of dual core CPUs or dual processors,
I was contemplating whether running Asterisk in two (or more) VMWare
sessions on a system might actually allow for more total performance. For
example, set up one VM to handle incoming lines, echo cancellation and all
sets, and then set up the other VM to handle VoIP, including transcoding.
A bit kludgy, to be sure, but would VMWare allow for both cores/CPUs to be
more fully utilized?
Very possibly not practical, but it's been floating about my head for a bit
and I figured I'd send it out into the ether to see what thoughts might come
back.
So . . . thoughts?
Jim.
********************************************************
Peter MacFarlane, ACP
Network Administration & Programming
Target Call Center/ Message Centre P.E.I.
*****************************************************************
OpenBSD's PF Firewall: Now available with CARP Failover.
Nothing to do with fish, but everything to do with security!
*****************************************************************
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Mike Ashton
Quality Track Intl
Ph: 647-722-2092 x 251
Cell: 416-527-4995
Fax: 416-352-6043
QTI CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
The contents of this material are confidential and proprietary to Quality Track
International, Inc.
and may not be reproduced, disclosed, distributed or used without the express
permission of an authorized representative of QTI.
Use for any purpose or in any manner other than that expressly authorized is
prohibited.
If you have received this communication in error, please immediately delete it
and all copies, and promptly notify the sender.
begin:vcard
fn:Mike Ashton
n:Ashton;Mike
org:Quality Track Intl
adr:;;63 Kenpark Ave;Brmpton;ON;L6Z 3L4;Canada
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:CTO
tel;work:905-840-4995
tel;cell:416-527-4995
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://www.QualityTrack.com
version:2.1
end:vcard
