Peter,

This is my understanding.

The Stratum of a timeserver is the proximity (hops) to an atomic clock source. So a Stratum 1 time server would actually be using a time source driven by an Atomic Clock ( 1 hop away). The UofT Stratum 1 server uses a GPS source (which is driven by the US Naval Observatory Master Clocks in Washington, DC and Colorado Springs, CO) and NRC has an actual Atomic clock. Usually you can't get access to the Stratum 1 servers. The Stratum 2 servers set their clocks from the Stratum 1 servers. So technically if you have a ntpd setting from a Stratum 2 server, yours would be a Stratum 3 ( hops from Atomic source ).

More info: http://tycho.usno.navy.mil/

Mike

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks again Mike. But the best part is that with the kids arguing over what time it was last night and the clicker disappearing AGAIN, the wife discovered she could dial *60 and find out how close to bed time it is! Gotta love those handy features.

The processor on my dual CPU seems to be particularly flakey. Hmmm....maybe I should sync to the OpenBSD firewall. It seemed easier to set up ntpd again on the * server. Probably better in the long run anyway. What's a Stratum 2 time server, for those of us not in the know? I usually use time.nrc.ca.

Peter M.

Peter,

System clocks are always pretty flakey. On all my machines I set up ntpdate to run every 6 hours. Even on my best machine it will adjust the clock usually .7-1.1 seconds every time it synchs and the bad systems 5-12 seconds. My main ntpd server I synch every hour from one of the u of t ntp servers which are Stratum2 time servers.

Mike

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks, dude. Excellent information on this list, as per usual. Now if I could just get the clock on the motherboard fixed. Seems like its losing its settings a lot but the battery looks OK. I think I have ntpd working OK in its place. Peter M. There are definite benefits to a dual/multi CPU machine. The actual asterisk program isn't multi threaded so it won't utilize more then one but, when other processes kick off like transcoding, festival, comedian the OS will utilize the other CPU(s) to distribute the load. SO there is a definite benefit just not as much as one would totally want. The only time there is no benefit is when you have no transcoding and only the core asterisk process running. But this is highly unusual. Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: *This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro* So running [EMAIL PROTECTED] on a dual processor P2 333 system is still a waste of processing power? CentOS does recognize both processors and loads the SMP kernel. Is there any benefit at all? Peter M.

********************************************************
Peter MacFarlane, ACP
Network Administration & Programming Target Call Center/ Message Centre P.E.I. *****************************************************************
OpenBSD's PF Firewall: Now available with CARP Failover.
Nothing to do with fish, but everything to do with security!
*****************************************************************



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





--
Mike Ashton

Quality Track Intl

Ph:     647-722-2092 x 251
Cell:   416-527-4995
Fax:    416-352-6043

QTI CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY INFORMATION

The contents of this material are confidential and proprietary to Quality Track 
 International, Inc.
and may not be reproduced, disclosed, distributed or used without the express 
permission of an authorized representative of QTI.
Use for any purpose or in any manner other than that expressly authorized is 
prohibited.
If you have received this communication in error, please immediately delete it 
and all copies, and promptly notify the sender.



begin:vcard
fn:Mike Ashton
n:Ashton;Mike
org:Quality Track Intl
adr:;;63 Kenpark Ave;Brmpton;ON;L6Z 3L4;Canada
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:CTO
tel;work:905-840-4995
tel;cell:416-527-4995
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://www.QualityTrack.com
version:2.1
end:vcard

Reply via email to