Anthony Boyington wrote:
2c and more... and its Monday.
I do agree, and the "why" was the first question asked, I really do not want
the BCM in the mix, however they already invested heavily in this system,
it's the backbone of their company, location (B) will not have this problem
so connecting (A) to (B) is where * comes in.
You might not need the Citel gateway if you are willing to keep the
i2004 phones at location A but can replace the BCM itself, since * 1.6
does have some support for the i2004 phones built-in.
You'd certainly want to put a few phones on a network and test this
extensively,
but it gets rid of the BCM without causing a lot of disruption on the
desktop. However there
are some limitations; since the i2004's "Unistim" protocol is not
publicly documented there are some phone pheatures that don't work.
Again, testing and expectations-management would be keys to success
along this path, should you undertake it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
