Impressive. Reza, few months ago, I was testing a Rogers wireless modem from 
Toronto to London and there were lots of dead spots. I don't think the driving 
speed mattered. Drivign at 120 km/hr it was still functioning well. But there 
were some serious gaps and loss of signal in large parts of the trip.

 

Wondering if that has changed? and if you in-car tests faced any issues?

 

Regards,

Bruce

 


 
> Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2010 10:32:41 -0400
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [on-asterisk] 3.5G Router to connect your USB 3.5G Modem, 
> aka.Internet Stick.
> 
> Also forgot to mention a cigarette light adapter is being introduced and
> currently being manufactured so you could literally plug the unit to a
> vehicle. The applications that I can think of for this kind of mobility is
> limitless and provides tremendous opportunities.
> 
> We had deployed one on Friday with SIP Phones connected to the unit to
> demonstrate capabilities at a business referral meeting. Feedback from
> attendees at the meeting was impressive, considering the quality of calls
> and everything else was superb.
> 
> -- 
> Toronto based VoIP / Asterisk Trainer,
> I.T. Consultant and Hosted PBX Solutions Provider.
> +1-647-476-2067.
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/seminar
> 
> 
> On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Reza - Asterisk Consultant <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Router redundancy for this test router I am playing with to fail over from
> > USB Based Internet Stick to WAN Ethernet Port and vice versa is being
> > introduced this month by the manufacturer. I brought this up to
> > manufacturer's attention last month. On top of this, I've requested the
> > manufacturer to make SIP data to take priority over any other traffic. So
> > out of the box, this unit will have priority for SIP packets which is
> > important for all of us.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Toronto based VoIP / Asterisk Trainer,
> > I.T. Consultant and Hosted PBX Solutions Provider.
> > +1-647-476-2067.
> > http://www.linkedin.com/in/seminar
> >
> >
                                          

Reply via email to