Sorry, I misread your e-mail. I thought you are trying to reach the VoIP 
providers rather than UPS. Probably Stephan's theory/facts are what is 
happening to you.


-Bruce



> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 10:46:36 -0400
> Subject: RE: [on-asterisk] UPS 1-800-742-5877 routing...
> 
> 
> Just tested all numbers and they were routing to appropriate companies. 
> 
> 
> Are you sure you are not entering the wrong digits? (I noticed all of these 
> companies use the word VOIP rather than actual digits which translates to 
> 8647)
> 
> 
> If that's not the case then maybe your provider has an issue. Or few 
> providers been hacked.
> 
> 
> -Bruce
> 
> 
> > From: [email protected]
> > Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 10:34:41 -0400
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: [on-asterisk] UPS 1-800-742-5877 routing...
> > 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > Just found out something strange trying to call UPS Canada 3 VoIP carriers:
> > 
> > Voicemeup and Les.net will end-up to the US UPS IVR which gives a choice of 
> > English and Spanish
> > Voip.ms if you select a canadian route for toll-free will end-up to UPS 
> > Canada but in an english only IVR
> > 
> > Calling the same number from a Montreal Cell or landline you get a 
> > french/english UPS Canada IVR.
> > 
> > I tried sending different CallerID but it's always the same.
> > 
> > Any ideas?
> > 
> > ---
> > Andre Courchesne - Consultant
> > http://www.net-forces.com
> > MSN: [email protected]
> > Skype: VoipForces
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > L'information contenue dans le présent document est la propriété de Andre 
> > Courchesne. Et est divulguée en toute confidentialité. Cette information ne 
> > doit pas être utilisée, divulguée à d'autres personnes ou reproduite sans 
> > le consentement écrit explicite de Andre Courchesne.
> > 
> > The information contained in this document is confidential and property of 
> > Andre Courchesne. It shall not be used, disclosed to others or reproduced 
> > without the express written consent of Andre Courchesne.
> > 
> 
                                          

Reply via email to