Mark, > I've discoverd that the NET4801 can only sustain 45 concurrent > calls with a churn rate of 10 seconds before the software crashes.
That is *only* 4Mbits/s upstream to handle those uLaw calls! Quite impressive. Is this with 0.4.2 AstLinux? If so, I suspect 0.3.0 would *only* give you 30 concurrent calls. I think we can safely say the net4801 can handle 10 simultaneous uLaw calls with a wide safety/quality margin. Great work, Mark. Lonnie On Aug 22, 2006, at 9:34 PM, Mark Phillips wrote: > Hi all, > > Before I go boring you all with my findings has someone already done > proper load testing of either the NET4801 or the Gumstix? > > I'm not planning to test the NET4801 per-se but rather am using my > spare > one as a learning tool for a consultancy job I've landed. In learning > about the SIPp tool I will have tested the Soekris box to death. For > example, I've discoverd that the NET4801 can only sustain 45 > concurrent > calls with a churn rate of 10 seconds before the software crashes. > > Now that I've built the test bed system/lan/etc It would be trivial to > swap the Soekris for my Gumstix and give that a try. I'm expecting > about > double the capacity purely based on processor size. > > If there's any interest in this I'd be happy to publish AFTER I've > done > my consultancy job (about another 3 weeks). > > Mark > > _______________________________________________ > Astlinux-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.kriscompanies.com/mailman/listinfo/astlinux-users > > Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _______________________________________________ Astlinux-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.kriscompanies.com/mailman/listinfo/astlinux-users Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
