> Would it be possible for you to rephrase what you've done in terms of > asyncio terminology? From what I can tell, "reactor" isn't a term used > in the asyncio docs or code base.
s/reactor/loop, in any case, I will take into account to make all of my comments consistency with the current Python documentation. >It might also improve the > readability of your asyncio patch to use asyncio terminology in the > code comments, doc strings, etc. Just a POC to gather some feedbacks. But appreciate your comment, I will take into account for new code. -- --pau _______________________________________________ Async-sig mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/async-sig Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
