Hi, The other thing to keep in mind is the hardware assist for things like TIM parsing, wakeup, etc will likely not work. :)
-a On 31 May 2016 at 03:50, Michal Kazior <michal.kaz...@tieto.com> wrote: > On 31 May 2016 at 10:44, jpo <pommn...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> Hello all, >> to implement a "Stealth feature", e.g. the WLAN network does not show up in >> normal Scans, we modified the Frame version, Beacon and Probe-Response >> values for an old ATH5K card running on the now dormant Madwifi driver. >> Question: Is the same thing even POSSIBLE with ath10k? My main concern is, >> that the firmware just won't handle non-standard values. >> >> Can somebody who understands the division of labor between mac80211, ath10k, >> the firmware and the hardware suppress his or her gag reflex long enough to >> think about this? > > First and foremost you'll need to use firmware with "raw-mode" support > - otherwise firmware just craps over frame headers. Some 10.2.4 > support it - you can look into the mailing list archive for some > discussions. > > Not sure if Rx will work though as firmware-controlled Rx filters may > prevent you from receiving frames with crazy frame_control values. > You'll need to check this out yourself. Some firmware revisions might > have RX_FILTER wmi command support but this isn't used/documented > anywhere and it's questionable how much it allows you to override. > > Whatever you find it'd be nice if you post whatever you find out (for > posterity :) > > > MichaĆ > > _______________________________________________ > ath10k mailing list > ath10k@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k