On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 04:31:38PM +0530, Rakesh Pillai wrote:
> Add a wifi-firmware subnode for the wifi node.
> This wifi-firmware subnode is needed for the
> targets which do not support TrustZone.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rakesh Pillai <pill...@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/qcom,ath10k.txt | 14
> ++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/qcom,ath10k.txt
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/qcom,ath10k.txt
> index 71bf91f..65ee68e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/qcom,ath10k.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/qcom,ath10k.txt
> @@ -96,6 +96,17 @@ Optional properties:
> - qcom,coexist-gpio-pin : gpio pin number information to support coex
> which will be used by wifi firmware.
>
> +* Subnodes
> +The ath10k wifi node can contain one optional firmware subnode.
> +Firmware subnode is needed when the platform does not have TustZone.
> +The firmware subnode must have:
> +
> +- iommus:
> + Usage: required
> + Value type: <prop-encoded-array>
> + Definition: A list of phandle and IOMMU specifier pairs.
> +
> +
> Example (to supply PCI based wifi block details):
>
> In this example, the node is defined as child node of the PCI controller.
> @@ -196,4 +207,7 @@ wifi@18000000 {
> memory-region = <&wifi_msa_mem>;
> iommus = <&apps_smmu 0x0040 0x1>;
> qcom,msa-fixed-perm;
> + wifi-firmware {
> + iommus = <&apps_iommu 0xc22 0x1>;
Why can't you just add a 2nd entry to the existing 'iommus' property?
A driver doing of_dma_configure() is generally not the right thing to
do.
Rob
_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
