ath10k currently reports survey results for the last interval between each
invocation of NL80211_CMD_GET_SURVEY. For concurrent invocations, this
can lead to unexpectedly small results, e.g. when hostapd uses survey
data and iw survey dump is invoked in parallel. Fix this by returning
cumulative results, that don't depend on the last invocation. Other
drivers, e.g. ath9k or mt76 also use this behavior.

Signed-off-by: Markus Theil <markus.th...@tu-ilmenau.de>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c 
b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c
index a81a1ab2de19..451c8275d07b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c
@@ -5802,16 +5802,16 @@ static int ath10k_wmi_event_pdev_bss_chan_info(struct 
ath10k *ar,
 
        survey = &ar->survey[idx];
 
-       survey->noise     = noise_floor;
-       survey->time      = div_u64(total, cc_freq_hz);
-       survey->time_busy = div_u64(busy, cc_freq_hz);
-       survey->time_rx   = div_u64(rx_bss, cc_freq_hz);
-       survey->time_tx   = div_u64(tx, cc_freq_hz);
-       survey->filled   |= (SURVEY_INFO_NOISE_DBM |
-                            SURVEY_INFO_TIME |
-                            SURVEY_INFO_TIME_BUSY |
-                            SURVEY_INFO_TIME_RX |
-                            SURVEY_INFO_TIME_TX);
+       survey->noise      = noise_floor;
+       survey->time      += div_u64(total, cc_freq_hz);
+       survey->time_busy += div_u64(busy, cc_freq_hz);
+       survey->time_rx   += div_u64(rx_bss, cc_freq_hz);
+       survey->time_tx   += div_u64(tx, cc_freq_hz);
+       survey->filled    |= (SURVEY_INFO_NOISE_DBM |
+                             SURVEY_INFO_TIME |
+                             SURVEY_INFO_TIME_BUSY |
+                             SURVEY_INFO_TIME_RX |
+                             SURVEY_INFO_TIME_TX);
 exit:
        spin_unlock_bh(&ar->data_lock);
        complete(&ar->bss_survey_done);
-- 
2.26.2


_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k

Reply via email to