gree...@candelatech.com wrote: > From: Ben Greear <gree...@candelatech.com> > > This makes per-chain RSSI be more consistent between HT20, HT40, HT80. > Instead of doing precise log math for adding dbm, I did a rough estimate, > it seems to work good enough. > > Tested on ath10k-ct 9984 firmware. > > Signed-off-by: Ben Greear <gree...@candelatech.com>
Commented out code etc so I assume this is an RFC. Has anyone tested this with upstream firmware? Patch set to RFC. -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20191217183343.25585-1-gree...@candelatech.com/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
