Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.barysh...@linaro.org> writes:

>> 3) ADD that compatible to the wifi node in msm8998.dtsi
>>    compatible = "qcom,wcn3990-wifi", "qcom,msm8998-wifi";
>> 4) In the driver, set qmi->fake_msa_ready_indicator to true if we
>> detect "qcom,msm8998-wifi"
>>
>> And this approach would be acceptable to both ath10k & DT maintainers?
>
> I'd say, we should take a step back and actually verify how this was
> handled in the vendor kernel.

One comment related to this: usually vendor driver and firmware branches
go "hand in hand", meaning that a version of driver supports only one
specific firmware branch. And there can be a lot of branches. So even if
one branch might have a check for something specific, there are no
guarantees what the other N+1 branches do :/

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

Reply via email to