Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 03:55:58PM -0700, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > >> If I understand this correctly, madwifi is no longer a non-free driver? >> > > MadWifi is based on a proprietary HAL which is slightly different > than this one, so no, its still non-free. The "free" drivers where > I think focus should be put in is ath5k and ath9k as they are now both > merged as part of the Linux kernel. >
The hal is not proprietary; Atheros just won't allow me to release it. And there are significant differences between the two code bases. Sam _______________________________________________ ath5k-devel mailing list ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel