On 22.2.2009 21:18, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote: > This case is more > coarse as it only deals with allocation rather than initialisation (and > if you scribble the same value as the poison pattern you go undetected)
This is false negative, yes. > but I believe this is what Jiri is referring to as a "no false positive > possibility" case - it's never right to write to unallocated memory. Exactly, thanks. _______________________________________________ ath5k-devel mailing list ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel
