On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 08:03:52PM +0000, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote: > The machine where this fault happened is a single core non-symmetric > multithreading EeePC 900 with a Celeron M 900 using a voluntary preempt > kernel (so I doubt this is due to tasklets being run on another CPU)...
This particular one could still happen on UP, provided interrupts were enabled in ath5k_rx_start (I don't think that's very likely, though. I tried warning on that case and didn't hit it). > I am a bit unsure which patches you want me to be testing though... None. Perhaps it's wishful thinking but a function trace for the few minutes prior to the poison would be useful. A good replicator might be to run a sequence of automatic suspend/resume with pm_test, in parallel with iwlist wlan0 scan (as root, so scans are actually performed), in parallel with iperf or ping. I didn't personally have luck with that workload, though. -- Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com _______________________________________________ ath5k-devel mailing list ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel
