If we are trying to interpolate a curve with slope == 0, the return
value will always be the y-coordinate.  In this code we are looping
until we reach a minimum y-coordinate on a line, which in the 0-slope
case can never happen, thus the loop never terminates.

The PCDAC steps come from the EEPROM and should never be equal, but
we should gracefully handle that case, so warn and bail out.

Reported-by: Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Bob Copeland <m...@bobcopeland.com>
---

This ok?  (based on top of the wireless-testing tree -- the patch
that's already there can go for 2.6.30.  This is in addition to that
patch, this handles the other, unlikely, corner case.)

Having looked at the code, I don't see why we need to loop at all,
couldn't we just invert the slope and solve directly for y=0?
Certainly recomputing the slope in a loop could be optimized.
Anyway, that's another patch for another day.

 drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/phy.c |    3 +++
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/phy.c 
b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/phy.c
index d0d1c35..a876ca8 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/phy.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/phy.c
@@ -1897,6 +1897,9 @@ ath5k_get_linear_pcdac_min(const u8 *stepL, const u8 
*stepR,
        s16 min_pwrL, min_pwrR;
        s16 pwr_i;
 
+       if (WARN_ON(stepL[0] == stepL[1] || stepR[0] == stepR[1]))
+               return 0;
+
        if (pwrL[0] == pwrL[1])
                min_pwrL = pwrL[0];
        else {
-- 
1.6.0.6

-- 
Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com

_______________________________________________
ath5k-devel mailing list
ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org
https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel

Reply via email to