On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 08:22:51AM -0400, Bob Copeland wrote: > On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 09:09:04AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 23:03 -0400, Bob Copeland wrote: > > > When we remove the active interface, there's no need to continue > > > sending beacons; doing so would cause a null pointer deref in > > > ieee80211_beacon_get(). Disable the interrupt in remove_interface > > > and add a WARN_ON(!vif) in case there are other instances lurking. > > > > There's a beacon_enabled setting passed in from mac80211, you should > > just use that? > > Hmm, yeah, I didn't know that. I'll check it out.
I'll take this one for now, and you can send a better one on top when you're ready. Thanks, John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linvi...@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready. _______________________________________________ ath5k-devel mailing list ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel
