On Friday 26 March 2010 09:44:31 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > as well, we all agree that there should be userland controls. the > > questions is just about the interface to use. > > ANI is specific to Atheros cards so debugfs would do it. If we want to > have a more rigit API we could use a configfs entry for ath9k.
debugfs definetly is the wrong place! users might compile the module with debugging disabled (for performance reasons, e.g.). are you sure about configfs? as far as i read about it it's for the dynamic creation of kernel objects, which is not what we are doing here. or did the rules change in the mean time? bruno _______________________________________________ ath5k-devel mailing list ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel
