2010/6/5 Robert Brown <robert.br...@gmail.com>: > On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Benoit Papillault > <benoit.papilla...@free.fr> wrote: >> >> Le 05/06/2010 14:01, Robert Brown a écrit : >>> >>> Comments below ... >>> >>> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 4:34 AM, Benoit Papillault >>> <benoit.papilla...@free.fr <mailto:benoit.papilla...@free.fr>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> It helps for sure. But i'm not seeing in your log where do you >>> receive the duplicate 110413 & 110414 packet. Is it in the log? Is >>> it indeed missing in the log? >>> >>> I don't think the block is received twice. It just appears in the >>> destination >>> file twice. There's no second reception in the log. >> >> According to your log, it's not even received once :-). > > > Block 110413/110414 appears twice in the destination file, overwriting block > 110412. The first time block 110413/110414 should have been sent, debugging > code indicates that ath5k_tasklet_rx sees the contents of block 107223 > instead. I think the hardware copied block 110413/110414 over the contents > of 110412. > Jun 4 14:40:35 ugg kernel: [238080.728324] ATH 0 block 110410 110411 > Jun 4 14:40:35 ugg kernel: [238080.728376] MACI 0 block 110410 110411 > Jun 4 14:40:35 ugg kernel: [238080.728453] MACO 0 block 110410 110411 > Jun 4 14:40:35 ugg kernel: [238080.728817] ATH 0 block 110412 0 > Jun 4 14:40:35 ugg kernel: [238080.728875] MACI 0 block 110412 0 > Jun 4 14:40:35 ugg kernel: [238080.728978] MACO 0 block 110412 0 > Jun 4 14:40:35 ugg kernel: [238080.730060] ATH 0 block 107223 0 > Jun 4 14:40:35 ugg kernel: [238080.730120] MACI 0 block 107223 0 > No MACO is printed, so the block 107223 skb was dropped. > Jun 4 14:40:35 ugg kernel: [238080.730962] ATH 0 block 110415 0 > Jun 4 14:40:35 ugg kernel: [238080.731022] MACI 0 block 110415 0 > Jun 4 14:40:35 ugg kernel: [238080.731105] MACO 0 block 110415 0 > Later, block 110413/110414 is retransmitted. > Jun 4 14:40:35 ugg kernel: [238080.765530] ATH 0 block 110458 110459 > Jun 4 14:40:35 ugg kernel: [238080.765591] MACI 0 block 110458 110459 > Jun 4 14:40:35 ugg kernel: [238080.765694] MACO 0 block 110458 110459 > Jun 4 14:40:35 ugg kernel: [238080.767955] ATH 0 block 110413 110414 > Jun 4 14:40:35 ugg kernel: [238080.768045] MACI 0 block 110413 110414 > Jun 4 14:40:35 ugg kernel: [238080.768129] MACO 0 block 110413 110414 > Jun 4 14:40:35 ugg kernel: [238080.769265] ATH 0 block 0 0 > Jun 4 14:40:35 ugg kernel: [238080.769280] MACI 0 block 0 0 > Jun 4 14:40:35 ugg kernel: [238080.769302] MACO 0 block 0 0 > Jun 4 14:40:35 ugg kernel: [238080.769516] ATH 0 block 0 0 > Jun 4 14:40:35 ugg kernel: [238080.769527] MACI 0 block 0 0 > Jun 4 14:40:35 ugg kernel: [238080.769560] MACO 0 block 0 0 > Jun 4 14:40:35 ugg kernel: [238080.770247] ATH 0 block 110460 0 > Jun 4 14:40:35 ugg kernel: [238080.770306] MACI 0 block 110460 0 > Jun 4 14:40:35 ugg kernel: [238080.770388] MACO 0 block 110460 0 >
Just in case can you try changing rx dma size ? It's on reset.c, line 1367, try 64B and see how it goes... -- GPG ID: 0xD21DB2DB As you read this post global entropy rises. Have Fun ;-) Nick _______________________________________________ ath5k-devel mailing list ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel
