Hi Jiri, On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 10:20:17AM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote: > On 08/07/2010 07:21 PM, Daniel Mack wrote: > > [ 2.142771] ath5k 0000:00:0c.0: guessed PCI INT A -> IRQ 9 > > [ 2.148319] ath5k 0000:00:0c.0: sharing IRQ 9 with 0000:00:01.2 > > [ 2.154548] ath5k 0000:00:0c.0: registered as 'phy0' > > [ 3.126593] irq 9: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option) > > [ 3.130015] Pid: 1, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.35+ #1 > > [ 3.130015] Call Trace: > > [ 3.130015] [<c013e984>] __report_bad_irq+0x2e/0x6f > > [ 3.130015] [<c013eab5>] note_interrupt+0xf0/0x147 > > [ 3.130015] [<c013f076>] handle_level_irq+0x6d/0x99 > > [ 3.130015] [<c0103bf6>] handle_irq+0x1a/0x20 > > [ 3.130015] [<c0103810>] do_IRQ+0x33/0x88 > > [ 3.130015] [<c0102a69>] common_interrupt+0x29/0x30 > > [ 3.130015] [<c0120e3c>] ? __do_softirq+0x34/0xca > > [ 3.130015] [<c0120ef7>] do_softirq+0x25/0x2a > > [ 3.130015] [<c0120fb7>] irq_exit+0x28/0x57 > > [ 3.130015] [<c0103850>] do_IRQ+0x73/0x88 > > [ 3.130015] [<c0102a69>] common_interrupt+0x29/0x30 > > [ 3.130015] [<c013007b>] ? __async_schedule+0x38/0xe9 > > [ 3.130015] [<c013e420>] ? __setup_irq+0x1d8/0x259 > > [ 3.130015] [<c013e544>] request_threaded_irq+0xa3/0xd0 > > [ 3.130015] [<c02486e5>] ? ath5k_intr+0x0/0x28b > > [ 3.130015] [<c032e15c>] ath5k_pci_probe+0x2f4/0x13c5 > > The interrupt came right after enabled in probe function with > ATH_STAT_INVALID still set. Is this really a 2.6.34 regression? The only > difference I see that we now (in .35) use MIB interrrupts.
I can't tell exactly when things broke, but appearantly, it worked in 2.6.31.4. I'll get back to this issue in some days when I have access to the hardware again. I would also bisect this topic then if neccessary. Thanks, Daniel _______________________________________________ ath5k-devel mailing list ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel
