On Wed September 15 2010 12:40:36 Jonathan Guerin wrote: > On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Jonathan Guerin <jonat...@guerin.id.au> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I have some behaviour I'm observing with some Atheros cards we use > > that doesn't seem to match what the initvals of ath5k are set up to. > > These are the cards I used: > > http://www.mini-box.com/s.nl/it.A/id.387/.f > > > > I have run a saturated iPerf flow on a conducted testbed with both > > stations being inside RF-shielding boxes. They are set to 802.11a > > mode, on channel 1. I then parse the trace, looking for ACK-DATA > > pairs, and calculating the time difference between them. From this, I > > remove the TX_TIME of the DATA frame, as well as a DIFS: > > > > ACK_TIMESTAMP + DIFS + CONTENTION_TIME + DATA_TX_TIME = DATA_TIMESTAMP > > > > which will leave me with the CONTENTION_TIME. Dividing this time by a > > SLOT_TIME will give me the slot which was chosen by the hardware. > > > > > > According to the driver, in ath5k.h: > > > > #define AR5K_TUNE_CWMIN 15 > > > > CWMIN is initialised to 15. > > > > The actual distribution of contention slots I'm observing resembles this: > > > > Slot Number,Count > > 0,1315 > > 1,1302 > > 2,1249 > > 3,1291 > > 4,1347 > > 5,1219 > > 6,1249 > > 7,0 > > 8,0 > > 9,0 > > <truncated> > > > > as well as 1360 frames which came in with a negative CONTENTION_TIME. > > > > Ignoring the fact that some frames are coming up with a negative > > CONTENTION_TIME (which potentially points to another problem), what is > > being observed here is that CW_MIN appears to start at 7, rather than > > the 15 which it should be. > > > > I'm just wondering if anyone would have any idea why this is occurring? > > Sorry to bring the post back on topic, I'm just trying to narrow down > what the driver is doing with the CW_MIN and CW_MAX parameters. > > $$ ath5k.h > #define AR5K_TUNE_CWMIN 15 > #define AR5K_TUNE_CWMIN_11B 31 > #define AR5K_TUNE_CWMIN_XR 3 > #define AR5K_TUNE_CWMAX 1023 > #define AR5K_TUNE_CWMAX_11B 1023 > #define AR5K_TUNE_CWMAX_XR 7 > > $$ qcu.c > /* > * Set DFS properties for a transmit queue on DCU > */ > int ath5k_hw_reset_tx_queue(struct ath5k_hw *ah, unsigned int queue) > { > <... truncated ...> > /* > * Calculate cwmin/max by channel mode > */ > cw_min = ah->ah_cw_min = AR5K_TUNE_CWMIN; > cw_max = ah->ah_cw_max = AR5K_TUNE_CWMAX; > ah->ah_aifs = AR5K_TUNE_AIFS; > /*XR is only supported on 5212*/ > if (IS_CHAN_XR(ah->ah_current_channel) && > ah->ah_version == AR5K_AR5212) { > cw_min = ah->ah_cw_min = AR5K_TUNE_CWMIN_XR; > cw_max = ah->ah_cw_max = AR5K_TUNE_CWMAX_XR; > ah->ah_aifs = AR5K_TUNE_AIFS_XR; > /*B mode is not supported on 5210*/ > } else if (IS_CHAN_B(ah->ah_current_channel) && > ah->ah_version != AR5K_AR5210) { > cw_min = ah->ah_cw_min = AR5K_TUNE_CWMIN_11B; > cw_max = ah->ah_cw_max = AR5K_TUNE_CWMAX_11B; > ah->ah_aifs = AR5K_TUNE_AIFS_11B; > } > > cw_min = 1; > while (cw_min < ah->ah_cw_min) > cw_min = (cw_min << 1) | 1; > > cw_min = tq->tqi_cw_min < 0 ? (cw_min >> (-tq->tqi_cw_min)) : > ((cw_min << tq->tqi_cw_min) + (1 << tq->tqi_cw_min) - 1); > cw_max = tq->tqi_cw_max < 0 ? (cw_max >> (-tq->tqi_cw_max)) : > ((cw_max << tq->tqi_cw_max) + (1 << tq->tqi_cw_max) - 1); > <... truncated ...> > } > > $$ attach.c > int ath5k_hw_attach(struct ath5k_softc *sc) > { > <... truncated ...> > /* > * HW information > */ > ah->ah_radar.r_enabled = AR5K_TUNE_RADAR_ALERT; > ah->ah_turbo = false; > ah->ah_txpower.txp_tpc = AR5K_TUNE_TPC_TXPOWER; > ah->ah_imr = 0; > ah->ah_atim_window = 0; > ah->ah_aifs = AR5K_TUNE_AIFS; > ah->ah_cw_min = AR5K_TUNE_CWMIN; > <... truncated ...> > } > > I'm trying to understand where the CW_MIN value is being set. My > understanding is that if the hardware is in 802.11a (non-turbo) mode, > it will be set to AR5K_TUNE_CWMIN, both when it is attached, and when > the queue is reset. > > Is there anywhere else that this value might be overridden and explain > the behaviour I'm observing? I can see a few places where the queues > are initilised to AR5K_TXQ_USEDEFAULT - does this make the card pull > the value from the ah->ah_cw_min variable?
hey, yes this is completey fcked up, weird and even wrong. as i said i'll post a patch to that today, soon... better to wait with your review until that. bruno _______________________________________________ ath5k-devel mailing list ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel
