Any chance we can 'acquire' those test plans? ;-) -- Jonathan Guerin
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Kalle Valo <kv...@adurom.com> wrote: > Jonathan Guerin <jonat...@guerin.id.au> writes: > >> So, we would prefer to match the spec for an out-of-the-box build, >> even tho it would appear to be a worse-performing driving to users? > > If "an out-of-the-box build" means correctly working 802.11 device > then my opinion is yes, we should strive to match the spec even if the > performance decreases. Getting performance increases by violating the > spec is just stealing airtime from others. > > But the challange is how to know if another 802.11 device is properly > working and following the spec? I know that Wi-Fi Alliance > certification tests contain lots of throughput tests to test for > contending the medium. So, for example, can we trust a device which > has passed Wi-Fi certification? I don't know. > > -- > Kalle Valo > _______________________________________________ ath5k-devel mailing list ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel
