On Wed November 24 2010 05:11:57 Nick Kossifidis wrote: > 2010/11/23 Luis R. Rodriguez <lrodrig...@atheros.com>: > > On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 11:04:43AM -0800, Nick Kossifidis wrote: > > > > Are you willing to deal with *all* bug reports for this? > > > > Luis > > I don't enable 5/10/40MHz operation anywhere for now, it's just there > for testing/debug. I tested it and it seems to work fine (also with a > spectrum analyzer) but until we come up with the proper way to set > this from user-space I'll wait. Also have in mind I just do what > Atheros does on initvals, nothing new, I just diffed initvals/rfbuffer > settings between turbo/non-turbo modes, found what's changing and how > (i had 5/10MHz code from HAL for that -as i wrote on another mail > 5/10/40MHz work mostly the same way-) and implemented it on code. Now > it's much cleaner + it actually works so i don't see a problem with > that. Before we had code for turbo that didn't work and duplicated > arrays of initvals/rfbuffer settings for no reason. > > Have in mind that there are people out there that want 5/10MHz support > badly to implement 802.11p on top of it (or for research) and people > who want to get rid of MadWiFi on OpenWRT and use turbo mode with > ath5k. We had to do this sometime, it's not a dirty hack, i think the > implementation is clean and simple. > > As for bug reports we already have bug reports about cards that fail > to wake up that we are unable to debug because we have no idea what's > going on, you can't choose what you 'll do based on possible bug > reports, bugs are part of the process...
Hey Nick! It's great to see that patch series! Glad you're back... I'll look at the individual patches later, but it's a lot - as you know ;) bruno _______________________________________________ ath5k-devel mailing list ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel
