On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 04:02:10PM +0400, Sergey Ryazanov wrote: > 2014-09-05 15:33 GMT+04:00 Paul Bolle <pebo...@tiscali.nl>: > > Hi Sergey, > > > > On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 15:12 +0400, Sergey Ryazanov wrote: > >> 2014-09-05 14:10 GMT+04:00, Paul Bolle <pebo...@tiscali.nl>: > >> > On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 13:46 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: > >> >> Having this conversation every rc1 is getting a bit silly. Could Jiri > >> >> e.a. perhaps set some specific deadline for ATHEROS_AR231X to be > >> >> submitted? > >> > > >> > I waited until rc3. Have you seen any activity on this front? If not, > >> > should I resend the patch that removes the code in mainline that depends > >> > on ATHEROS_AR231X (ie, AHB bus support)? > >> > > >> Recent activity always could be found in [1]. Now I finish another one > >> round of cleanups and have a plan to fix several things (you can > >> always find something that you really want to improve). But if you > >> insist I could immediately switch to "send upstream" mode. And seems > >> that this would be better approach. > >> > >> 1. https://dev.openwrt.org/log/trunk/target/linux/atheros > > > > And where can the related PULL requests or patch submissions be found? > > > I have not sent patches yet, since I thought that it would be easier > to cleanup them in openwrt tree and then send them upstream.
That excuse has worn a bit thin. Perhaps Paul should repost his removal and you can add a revert to the start of your patch series? John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linvi...@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready. _______________________________________________ ath5k-devel mailing list ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel
