On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 07:23:44AM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 7:19 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez > <lrodrig...@atheros.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez > > <lrodrig...@atheros.com> wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez > >> <lrodrig...@atheros.com> wrote: > >>> This series started off to extend support for ar9271 on ath9k_hw > >>> but after review of the phy related code I noticed a fix for > >>> AR5416 was only partially being implemented and used for all > >>> chipsets. This series then adds the changes I've noticed so far > >>> required for ar9271 but also fixes and completes the orientation > >>> fix for AR5416 (force bias). Since I'm touching phy.c I also extend > >>> documentation for it. > >>> > >>> I don't have AR9285 cards with me but I do have an AR5416 cardbus > >>> card -- I'd appreciate it if someone can give this a test on AR9285 > > > > Alright well I made it back to California and tested an AR9285 and > > things are peachy so I will submit this now. > > Johh, actually instead of resubmitting can you take these in as-is? > They should apply on top of the latest tree. Please let me know.
I'm a little buried ATM, but sure -- that'll be fine... John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linvi...@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready. _______________________________________________ ath9k-devel mailing list ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
