On 2010-01-29 9:10 AM, Joerg Pommnitz wrote: > --- rootki...@yahoo.it <rootki...@yahoo.it> wrote: > >> >> Can you try in AP-client mode? I think you'll get more >> throughput so. >> > > No, IBSS is what I'm interested in. And the point is, that there is > a 30% performance difference between ath5k (and Madwifi) and ath9k. Even > if the performance in AP mode would be better, this does not change the > problem in IBSS mode. I can confirm these numbers for AP/Client mode as well. I've even tested legacy communication between ath9k ap and sta, producing the same result. Additionally, I can rule out the rate control algorithm, as using minstrel instead of the ath9k RC produces a very similar throughput test result.
- Felix _______________________________________________ ath9k-devel mailing list ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
