On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 06:53:06PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> Here's what I have so far, this is rebased on top of Senthil's patches > >>> for ath9k_htc posted today. Just tested it on my AR9280, it doesn't > >>> break anything. > >> > >> BTW the new ath9k_htc series + this series can be downloaded in one file > >> from: > >> > >> http://bombadil.infradead.org/~mcgrof/tmp/all-ar93xx-03-17-v3.patch > > > > bleh, I did not use -M here... let me resend with that for the renames. > > On second thought John -- please hold off on merging these new ar93xx > abstraction patches, we are trying to mathematically prove if ar9002 > register definitions are the same as the ar9003 ones and if so well > this is all pointless :D
Did this get resolved? John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you [email protected] might be all we have. Be ready. _______________________________________________ ath9k-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
